Re: [Bug 588] New: Review Request: rpmfusion-remixes-kickstarts -- Kickstart files for creating distributions or remixes with RPM Fusion packages

2009/5/3 RPM Fusion Bugzilla <noreply(a)rpmfusion.org&gt;: While trying to access the bug report, I'm receiving: "You are not authorized to access bug #588. " So, until the problem is solved, here are few comments: I'm a little chocked by the implication of this content. I was said that rpmfusion was an additional repository for content not acceptable within Fedora; with the redistribution of the livecd called RPMFusion, it becomes a fork of Fedora (even if we don't replace package from fedora itself, in theory). I'm just not prepared for that. So, I Don't want to prevent further discution but at this time: "I explicitly disagree on using the RPMFusion name to redistribute a spin including whatever comes from both free/nonfree rpmfusion repositories." Once that said, redistribution of kickstart files aimed for end-users to create a livecd for their own use remains acceptable. We previously had a discussion on this list about Omega, which was very badly leaded because of the misunderstanding of each other position. I for one disagreed on using vlc of such spins for various reasons. But at least the Omega name doesn't clash with the RPMFusion additional repository content. So, as i don't want to raise a discussion that start with agrees/disagrees and won't meant anything,I would just ask one question: Shall we give the illusion to provide end-users a final product, or shall we keep the "meaning gap" of nonfree/"free but patented software/FOSS to "educate" end-users ? Nicolas (kwizart)