Re: libspotify in non-free?

2012/1/4 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter(a)lesbg.com&gt;: > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2012/1/4 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter(a)lesbg.com&gt;: >> > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:55 +1100, David Timms wrote: >> >> On 04/01/12 22:31, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >> >> > Does anyone object to putting libspotify into non-free? I've put >> >> > together a package, but I'm not sure what their redistribution policy >> >> > is. The main thing in their Terms of Use seems to be that it's for >> >> > non-commercial use, but I don't think that's a problem for non-free. >> >> For those of us not in the know: What is the URL to point to some info >> >> about the software ? >> > >> > Sorry, here it is: >> > http://developer.spotify.com/en/libspotify/overview/ >> >> Hello, >> >> It might be redistributable but then for which usage ? >> Do you know a package that will use this library and at the same time, >> don't plan to embed the exact libspotify version they will use to >> instead, rely on a system library ? >> >> Also, I'm not sure about what the application key is for ? > > I'm looking at mopidy (http://www.mopidy.com) which is a MPD server that > uses Spotify as it's music source. It doesn't come with libspotify > bundled, and I've put together packages for it, pyspotify, libspotify > and pykka. AFAIC, whatever application key is needed is embedded in > mopidy. FWIW, Mopidy, pyspotify and pykka are all licensed under ASL > 2.0. OK, But then this just move the problem elsewhere. What is the application key for mopidy allowed to be redistributed ? Will we be able to build mopidy from source and bundle their key ?