Re: Populating CVS (was Re: Dribble Frozen)

2008/5/5 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt;: > Xavier Lamien wrote: > > > 2008/5/4 Ian Chapman <packages(a)amiga-hardware.com&gt;: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Just a quick note to those who it concerns that Dribble is now frozen > and > > > no new updates or packages will be permitted there. Most contributors > are > > > migrating their packages to RPM Fusion, including most of mine. Thanks > very > > > much and I wish RPM Fusion the best of luck. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot Ian, > > > > I think dribble will be the first to merge in next couple of days, as we > > have a clean frozen version of packages set. > > > > Hans give a signal for cvssync. > > > > > > Xavier, > > We (Dribble) don't have a CVS, given the low package count and churn we've > always been passing Ian srpms to build. > > So in order to get dribble's packages into rpmfusion cvs / look a side, > someone would need to go to: > http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms4.html > > Create cvs modules for all srpms listed there and then use cvs-import on > the srpms linked from there to populate the cvs modules. > > Owners for the modules can be found here: > http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge > > But I guess all owners first need to have a FAS account, so maybe now would > be a good moment to send a mail to the list asking everyone to create a FAS > account? > > Hmm, I just realized that creating cvs modules isn't that easy because we > first need to decide on a package for package base wether it goes to > non-free or free. > > So what are the rules for free? I would like to suggest the following: > > "free: anything of which all components are under a license which is listed > as > good on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > Notice that free fully follows this webpage except that chapter 6 > "Software > Types" is ignored. > > Notice that anything depending upon anything in non-free must be in > non-free > itself." > > Can everyone live with this? If we can agree this is the rule for the > non-free free split, then I can make a list of which packages in dribble > should go where. Hi ! I agree from this. I just want to notice that "-nonfree" expects at least the package to be redistributable. I don't expect dribble have such packages. But amr{nb,wb} codecs are ( altought opensource - we even cannot retristribute the sources). For such cases i guess it would be desirable to have nosrc.rpm in the SRPMS non-free section. http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrnb-7.0.0.0-1.nosrc.rpm http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/amrwb-7.0.0.2-1.nosrc.rpm I will request a review if allowed. Also all packages that can go to Fedora shouldn't be allowed in RPM Fusion. ( I have submitted some perl package freshrpms use for dvdrip at least) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444733 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444744 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444745 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444755 I don't know if this can concern some p2p programs that are problematic in some country...