https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
--- Comment #46 from Rob Janes <janes.rob(a)gmail.com> 2013-05-30 15:07:38 CEST ---
David T -
I'm still back at the "the EULA doesn't need to be shown or confirmed".
But,
for discussion -
* there's three separate font packages each with their own Eula/license etc.
If you want to go that route you'd feel yourself obligated to show each of
them, and allow for various combinations of disdain and refusal.
* you'd still have to find the rpm and queue it for installation. Sure, from
this point forward it would be just a few more clicks.
Here's where the installations of this font set are coming from.
1. fedora post install guides. copy and paste some instructions in a text box
to the command line.
2. autoplus - may be gone
3. fedorautils -
http://satya164.github.io/fedorautils/
4. easylife -
http://sourceforge.net/projects/easylife-linux/
Those are the end user experiences I'm aiming to improve.
The copy and paste to the command line is easier than the gui hunting and
clicking. A guide writer would have to have screenshots, which are a pain.
The fedorautils and easylife users just check and install. i don't know if
there's any eula.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.