Re: Hopefully a new member of the team
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
dominik(a)greysector.net> wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 16:12, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > 2008/11/18 Dejan Lekic <dejan.lekic(a)gmail.com>:
> >
> > > I am willing to maintain Portable.NET (or so-called the
"dotGNU"
project)
> > > packages. Portable.NET is an open-source, (L)GPL, implementation of
the
> > .NET
> > > 2.0 . I use my dotGNU RPMs quiet often and so far I haven't seen any
> > problem
> > > with them. I maintain contact with other users of my RPMs via
dotGNU's
> > > official IRC channel ( irc://irc.freenet.org/dotGNU ) and nobody
> > complained
> > > so far.
> > >
> > > I have some more RPMs that would be very interesting to be in
rpmfusion,
> > > but, since I am new here, I thought it would be the best to begin
with
> > > something. :)
> >
> >
> > Why you decided to push rpms into RPMFusion instead of Fedora/EPEL?
>
> frankly I did not think they would go into the main repository, at least
not
> yet.
Why not? Are there some patent or other legal issues involved? You can
always ask on fedora-legal-list to verify.
Regards,
R.
PS. Please do not top-reply.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
Well, I prefer using newsgroups instead, and this kind of reply is not my
cup of tea to be honest, but OK, I wll reply at the bottom. :)
No, there is not a single issue here, it is just me not willing to spend
time reading TWO mailing lists, TWO bugzillas, TWO repositories, etc. I
would much rather prefer working on one place (I hope so) - RPMForge. If
someone wish later to put these RPMs into Fedora, I will not mind, but that
person will have to maintain it.
--
Dejan Lekic
http://dejan.lekic.org
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.0 KB)