On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:42:18 +0100, Thorsten wrote:
>>>>>>>> libfaac.so.0
>>> Got it, faac did not get picked to be multilib :)
>> +1 points. :)
>>
>> Mission objective now is to find out the culprit: faac on multilib
>> blacklist?
>
> Nope.
>
>> Misconfigured pushscripts? (== couldn't load the i386 repo metadata
>> directly after pushing to it and while resolving for x86_64?)
>
> Don't think so, as
>
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development//x86_64/os/freetyp...
> (pushed on 2008-Dec-10) got properly multilibed. I'll take a closer
> look at the output during the next push and report back.
faac was multilibed properly now; not sure why it didn't happen during
the last push.
That confirms my speculations made in yesterday's reply, that the
pushscript accesses repos in /srv/local_repo/... not /srv/rpmbuild/...