Re: EL6 support in RPM Fusion buildsys ready
On 28.11.2010 12:45, solarflow99 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
<fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
> On 28.11.2010 11:51, solarflow99 wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>
wrote:
>>> Just FYI, building RPM Fusion packages for EL6 is possible now. Guess
>>> there will be a few rough edges here and there, so keep the eyes open
>>> and report any problems.
>> oh good, do you know if we have an EL-5 build system? There's no
>> rush, but I noticed my package in waiting status.
> Note that problems in our build infrastructure (like this) are one of
> the main reasons why I'm really unhappy about the state of RPM Fusion
> and want to have a break (see the other mail I just sent).
> This case for me boils down to: There are people that are supposed to
> take care about the build infrastructure and they are obviously not
> doing their work. Please ask them, not me, as I multiple times made
> clear that I don't want to do the administration of our build infra. In
> case you don't get satisfying results within a few days then ask me
> again please and I'll see what I can do to get a EL-5 builder running again.
ok, and if there's something I can help you out with just let me know,
rpmfusion has always been short staffed, so we have to do the best we
can I suppose. I'm willing to help where I can.
The direct problems at hand: The only x86 builder that is left has no
local CentOS/RHEL mirror; the admin of this machine might be able to
create one in the local net on the machine where other repos are
mirrored. Then all what is needed is creating a few config files, which
can be done in ~15 minutes or so. I can do that, but as I indicated
already: I'd say it's the job of our infra group and would prefer to
hear from them first before I once again step on their toes and do their
work (which I often did in the past and which might be more harmful then
helpful; don't know)
Some of the overall RPM Fusion problem we are facing in this area:
* where did the other x86 builders we had go? Seems they simply got
lost over time
* you and others iirc applied to help with infra work earlier; why
haven't you got access and/or instructions?
* seems there is not much interest in the el5 repo; some packages were
build, but nobody really cared and for a lot of people it seems the el5
branch was "fire once and forget" (part of the problem:
ownership/responsibilities were not clearly solved and owners.list for
el is wrong in some places); that's one of the reasons why I left all
the packages in testing
CU
knurd