http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1998
--- Comment #5 from NVieville <nicolas.vieville(a)univ-valenciennes.fr> 2011-10-26
19:25:34 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Thanks! Done!
One question: as you mentioned in your review comments, this version is
not the very last one (Broadcom published the last one yesterday
25/10/2011). What should I do to be the most "upstream" as possible?
Open a new review for the upstream version or wait for this one to be
accomplished and upgrade to the upstream version after? Excuse me for
such a question, but I'm not already very familiar with these
procedures.
SPEC:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/broadcom-wl/broadcom-wl.spec
SRPMS:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/broadcom-wl/broadcom-wl-5.100....
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/broadcom-wl.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/broadcom-wl-5.100.82.38-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/broadcom-wl-5.100.82.38-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.