On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:19:19 +0200
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> wrote:
Replying to an old mail:
On 13.08.2008 19:04, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:56:54 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 12.08.2008 16:25, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>>> $ rpm -qp --qf "%{archivesize}\n" mpd-0.13.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
>>>> 0
>>>>
>>>> $ rpm -qpi mpd-0.13.2-1.fc10.src.rpm |grep Host
>>>> Install Date: (not installed) Build Host:
>>>>
bombadil.infradead.org
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/458817
>> Thx for tracking this down and getting Panu to fix it. I suppose
>> we need to rebuild a bunch of packages (¹). But the buildsys is
>> still down; I haven't heard anything from Pix yet. :-/
> i386, x86_64: 3 packages
> gfceu
> ufoai-data
> vdrsync
> ppc, ppc64: 63 packages
> -full list below-
>
>> (¹) /me also wonders what Fedora will do; seems the mail from
>> mschwendt was ignored by everyone up to now
>
> Dunno whether those archivesize values are used in any important
> piece of code. ;) There's also "size" and the "installed"
size.
> All three are added to the metadata.
> [...]
Seems Fedora ignores this? Or was this just forgotten over all the
trouble in hte past weeks? What do we do?
It's a known issue, and a mass rebuild was being discussed, but the
timing isn't sure yet. In any case those packages will be rebuilt for
f10 one way or another. If a mass rebuild comes along soon, then they
will be rebuilt with everything else then.
Cu
knurd
kevin