http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467
--- Comment #11 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> 2009-03-30 10:41:54
---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
> I don't understand the fuzz about this.
> It may be old but "old != bad".
> If there's demand, then this will get reviewed. What are your worries about?
> Will this package bring bad reputation to rpmfusion or what?
+1
+1 from me as well
If someone wants to package this, why stop him?
Well, it creates work for others. E.g. load for the build on the server, space
on the server and the mirrors, one more package to take care of during
mass-rebuilds and more things like that. But whatever, I don't consider those
to be huge problems.
The only concern I have is
security issues. But if it turns out that this becomes a real issue, we
can always drop the package then.
Which doesn't magically remove the package from the users system, which makes
this point a bit questionable imho.
But if there is interest by someone to take care of this package and no real
show-stoppers anyone can point us to then let's just ship it. Only an full
security audit could make clean if mosaic has less or more security issues than
any other (outdated) package that is in Fedora or RPM Fusion.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.