Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

Hi, On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>> > > Hi, > > > On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > ... > sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64 > > > While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it called sidplayfp, > which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged libsidplayfp and > sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed to build with > libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so the following > packages can now be retired from rpmfusion: > > sidplay > sidplay-libs > audacious-plugins-nonfree > > I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. What is > the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion F-19+ repos ? > > > I will manually remove them from the repository. > taking care of that before the next push. > > BTW, what about an audacity update (in both fedora and RPM Fusion ?) > It looks unmaintained. I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but he is back now. I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once that is done I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages.