Le jeudi 19 novembre 2015, 13:23:48 Hans de Goede a écrit :
>> [htmlcxx]
Ok my bad, if it uses autoconf and a straight-forward build, then by
all means do package it for Fedora.
Is it ok for Fedora that the current only reverse dependency is in RPMFusion ?
>
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504222
>
> So I'd prefer to keep it separate; this part will likely require less uploads;
> only when GCC decide to break all C++ packages.
Ack, as said if it is a proper lib with autoconf packaging it separately
makes perfect sense.
Will handle that one too & lgogdownloader
> I'm already at the "koji build --scratch f23
rpmbuild/SRPM/innoextract-1.5-1.fc23.src.rpm" step ;-)
Great :)
Yup,