[Bug 2150] Review request: geom - SALOME Geometry Module
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150
--- Comment #3 from Miloš Komarčević <kmilos(a)gmail.com> 2012-01-24 20:16:11 CET ---
I thought the spec might look somewhat familiar. ;)
Oops. You're right, did not build in mock (running low on space on my machine).
Added those BRs now.
2. Have you reported the incorrect FSF address upstream?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3477860&group_id=...
(Have also opened issues related to the patches.)
Can you show me what/where in the source made you decide that the
license was
LGPLv2+? I couldn't find any meaningful occurence of "or later".
Ah, was confused myself. Most source files do still contain the word "either"
which threw me off, but it looks like "or later..." was removed, so it
wasn't
clear cut to me at that moment. We could presume the author(s) intentionally
removed the "or later..." bit from standard notice [1] but forgot to correct
the sentence for grammar? Maybe I should contact the upstream to clarify/fix
this as well?
I've put it as "LGPLv2 with exceptions" for now.
SPEC: http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/geom.spec
SRPM: http://kmilos.fedorapeople.org/geom-6.3.1.8-2.svn222.fc16.src.rpm
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html#TOC4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.