[Bug 1122] Review request: mame - Multiple Arcade Machine Emulator
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122
--- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-19 20:55:47 ---
1. I believe that the whole dance with splitting version between %version and
%release is to ensure proper upgrade paths. I checked that it works, 0137u10 >
0137u1 < 0137. And putting the "u" into the %global will break the algorithm
which applies the patches sequentially to the "u" releases. I know it was this
way in SDLMAME, but RB released it as full zips. I never liked the versions
like 0.137-0.1.0136u1 anyway.
2. I can't see it ;)
3. I could, but I can't do it for the main binary name, which would lead to
inconsistent use of macros. I can add other architectures, sure.
4. That's just one of the mirrors, I guess I could hardcode it as we do for
sourceforge/nongnu/whatever.
5. Valid point. This is a leftover from testing a bug. I'll fix that.
6. Obsoletes is OK, point 1 for Provides.
7. I can kill the duplicate docs, no problem.
The ini file was put into the subdir so that cab builders could place config
files in there without polluting /etc/.
ui.bdc was generated from ui.bdf, which was shipped with sdlmame zip. Aaron
said it might return someday, so I left it in.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.