[Bug 478] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Blocks|2 |4
URL| |http://jzygmont.fedorapeople
|http://jzygmont.fedorapeople|.org/
|.org/ |
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2009-04-02 08:04:08 ---
Just continuing the current status here:
SPEC: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec
SRPM: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu-1.4.0-2.1868svn.src.rpm
http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec
(In reply to comment #47)
(In reply to comment #46)
> > 1.) Source files
> >
> > Please comment on how did you get these:
>
>
> You mean comment where I got it in the spec file?
Exactly. Like:
# Get revision 1234 from SVN:
# svn co -r1234 http://repoistory-url@1234 dosbox
# tar --exclude .svn -czf dosbox.tar.gz dosbox
I see this is done.
> > Isn't etc/dosemu.xpm from the source tarball
sufficient?
> > Source3: %{name}.xpm
>
>
> I think I got that idea from the dosbox spec file, I can change it if
> necessary.
Yup. Just droop the Source3 and replace %{SOURCE3} with etc/dosemu.xpm
Done as well.
> > 2.) FreeDOS image
> >
> > I don't believe this is formally allowed (shipping binaries), though other
> > packages do this (say, qemu includes bochs bios image). I'll ask on
packaging
> > list how to deal with this and let you know.
Soo, I believe you should add the source for the FreeDOS image to the srpm, so
that we distribute it and therefore comply with GPL. Or ask FreeDOS people for
permission to distribute it w/o source.
Won't block though.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.