http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> 2008-10-20 00:41:25 ---
+ source files match upstream :9ee2d6c8bb192e214b2674042260cf36
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license
+ license is open source-compatible. License text is included.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds in mock.
+ package installs properly
+ rpmlint is silent.
= final provides and requires are sane:
Some duplicates requires with different versions specified. Harmless,
perl(WWW::Mechanize)
perl(WWW::Mechanize) >= 1.02
perl(XML::Twig)
perl(XML::Twig) >= 3.10
perl(XML::Twig) >= 3.28
+ %check is present and all tests pass
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
= No desktop file, but it's not really useful in this case.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.