Reducing the number of necessary repos with non-free software (was Re: the libdvdcss issue)
On Tuesday, 18 November 2008 at 13:27, Andreas Thienemann wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Hans de Goede wrote:
[...]
> And Fedora Legal actually has cleared doing that (linking to
rpmfusion from the
> wiki), this is something which still has to be implemented, but the permission
> is there. This was one of the main reasons to do the free / non-free split, to
> give Fedora something it can link to without even giving the appearance of
> promoting non free software.
Do not forget that one of the main reasons for fusion was the plan to
implement the Fedora + 1 repository concept for all software needs.
Right now we're probably at Fedora + rpmfusion + livna + adobe...
I wonder if we could arrange an agreement with Adobe to let us distribute
the Flash Plugin as an RPM package. Maybe Adobe Reader too.
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"