https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3554
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org> 2015-03-01 15:28:00
CET ---
Program itself seems to be working correctly.
* License
- Well, please never modify license text downstream, even
if rpmlint complains for it.
License modification must be done only on upstream.
* BuildRequires:
- For pkgconfig based BR (i.e. "PKG_CHECK_MODULES" in configure.ac)
it is better to use pkgconfig vitual BR, like
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(flac) (not a blocker)
* License tag
- (not a blocker) License tag can simply be GPLv2+
(This is effectively one single binary, and writing multiple
licenses where GPLv2+ is predominant actually does not make
sense)
* License file
- Use %license for license text:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging...
* %defattr
- %defattr can be removed (current rpmbuild does not need this
any longer)
* rpmfusion category
- Well, I think this is "free" category for rpmfusion, not
"nonfree"
This package needs to link the following nonfree
libraries, so this package is nonfree.
My recognition is that they are actually
"free" (patent issue
or so does not make it "nonfree" category), would you check
this? (Also check MOCK.log attached)
* incorrect-fsf-address rpmlint
- Please ping upsteam later (check rpmlint result for -debuginfo rpm)
(not a blocker)
Well, please check above. I don't see strict blocker for this package.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.