1:55 p.m.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1958
--- Comment #10 from Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it(a)gmail.com> 2011-11-19 14:55:07
CET ---
Hi Julian,
All good except rpmlint gives a warning about INSTALL files in %doc
Required
========
[-] Not applicable
[+] OK
[!] Attention
[ ] Not done
[+] named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[+] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+] Meet the Packaging Guidelines
[+] Approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines
[+] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license
[+] License file must be included in %doc
[+] The spec file must be written in American English
[+] The spec file for the package MUST be legible
[+] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
sha1sum:f3968d678724a0e0c0af811aec971d83839fe3b4
[+] Successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one arch
[+] Proper use of ExcludeArch
[+] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[+] The spec file MUST handle locales properly
[+] Shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries
[+] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package
[+] A package must own all directories that it creates
[+] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once
[+] Permissions on files must be set properly
[+] Each package must consistently use macros
[+] The package must contain code, or permissable content
[-] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
[+] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application
[-] Header files must be in a -devel package
[-] Static libraries must be in a -static package
[+] library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package
[+] devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
[+] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
[-] GUI apps must include a %{name}.desktop file, properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section
[+] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages
[+] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
Should Items
============
[+] the packager SHOULD query upstream for any missing license text files to
include it
[-] Non-English language support for description and summary sections in the
package spec if available
[+] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock
[ ] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described
[+] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane
[+] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using
a fully versioned dependency
[+] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) should usually be placed in a -devel pkg
[-] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file
instead of the file itself
[+] Should contain man pages for binaries/scripts
None available
gmtk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mplayer -> player, m player, mp
layer
gmtk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mediaplayer -> media player,
media-player, hypermedia
gmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mplayer -> player, m player,
mp layer
gmtk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mediaplayer -> media player,
media-player, hypermedia
gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mplayer -> player, m player, mp
layer
gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mediaplayer -> media player,
media-player, hypermedia
gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mplayer -> player, m
player, mp layer
gmtk.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mediaplayer -> media
player, media-player, hypermedia
gmtk.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/gmtk-1.0.5b1/INSTALL
gmtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.