[Bug 4393] Review Request: zoneminder - A camera monitoring and analysis tool

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393 --- Comment #25 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com&gt; --- Greetings Xavier, Thank you for the prodding me. Following up here has been in the back of mind for a couple weeks now. With the help of Damian, all of ZoneMinder's dependencies are now in the Fedora & EPEL repos. This has been a great learning experience. Just to be sure we are set, I did a mock build against el6, el7, f24, and f25 this morning, using the appropriate rpmfusion mock config, and they all built successfully. This is the spec file to use to build our latest 1.30.2 release: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ZoneMinder/ZoneMinder/1.30.2/distros/re... However, this is not the most recent. I've already made changes, which will appear in the upcoming 1.30.3 release "soon". You can see the progress of that specfile in our master branch here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ZoneMinder/ZoneMinder/master/distros/re... In the grand scheme of things, I'm trying to manage a single zoneminder spec file for three related, but different, purposes: - rpmfusion - an upstream build system for nightly builds - experimental nginx support This is the underlying reason why one might see content in the spec file that, today, might not apply to rpmfusion. During the process, I have indeed become part of the Fedora packaging group, so if I understand correctly that means I don't need an rpmfusion sponsor, but don't I still need someone to add my FAS account to the rpmfusion packaging group? My fas account name is Kni. In any case, feel free to continue the review process when your time allows. Due to the complicated nature of the zoneminder specfile, I'm sure there might be additional questions or concerns. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.