Re: amule not in fedora?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:45:17PM +0100, Aurélien Bompard wrote:
> Huh? Fedora CVS has bittorrent branches going all the way back
to RHL-8?
Well, I could be wrong but I think this is how the decision to put
aMule in Livna was made.
This was indeed a very strange reason that doesn't make sense from a
legal point of view nor from a fedora point of view, but lets forget
about that past.
--
Pat