Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote: >> On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande >>>> <anto.trande(a)gmail.com <mailto:anto.trande@gmail.com>>: >>>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet >>>> on Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild >>>> (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as >>>> soon as possible: >>>> >>>> faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame >>>> >>>> >>>> All of them are actually available, please double check >>>> your system. >>>> >>>> Nicolas (kwizart) >>>> >>> >>> Hi Nicolas, >>> >>> are available as fc23 packages? >> >> no , they are available as fc22 in F23 >> > > Honestly, I don't understand how we can tolerate something like > that, that is using on Fedora 23 some packages built on Fedora > 22; is there not any dependency issue? No. RPM doesn't care about disttag for dependencies unless you actually specify a dependency using it, e.g.: Requires: foo = 1.1-2.fc23 As long as SONAMEs match (or actually, as long as Provides: match), the dependencies are satisfied. There's nothing wrong with having .fc22 packages in F23+ repos.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWfydSAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8/NQIAKrVRStGTdPm4xgWtpFp5C5w eFtbhUnRqBnQ+oxEotuGFt1oyoqa5BYHWaoJ5XdY21hXFfP6v2H9BywTV3MN/07B itdx95emAvm9m5cNfi/Ft10qu00n1Ygm9h9w5dPsZvCSrnsNhL4sA+h9FTkqpR5E hHW5aLsPbjSqMEoLi+1H+g65JRWzEdknTAKB6pUpY1UIQEzF+as8VvHyJL/LlN1K 0If8cy96R0ksPGsBZPY/+P5MB/4Mk4sQSywVXLO13zhClmY86QHwMFFozoACfe/4 MY7jfdZk5QptKWJFwJp5S/ukAWdB4TeIwvquCe66VAjpRsp2j6quBHcr0BKK2ak= =KrN/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----