Re: renaming sdlmame to mame

Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life to rename sdlmame to mame. ��2010-03-16 04:49:41��"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; ������ >W dniu 18.01.2010 13:38, supercyper pisze: >> I agree with Andrea that >> the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame. >> SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by mame. >> >> See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was >> Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat. >> >> ��2010-01-17 17:45:24��"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; ������ >>>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze: >>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e. >>>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a >>>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a >>>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough? >>>> >>>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for >>>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame. >>>> >>>> Bye, >>>> >>>> Andrea. >>>> >>>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related >>>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from >>>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm >>>wondering if it's worth the effort. >>> >>>Julian >>> >> >> >> > >0.137 is out, I'll upload the new package for review in the next couple >of days. > >Julian >