[Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 --- Comment #15 from Lubos Stanek <lubek(a)users.sourceforge.net&gt; 2009-03-18 10:47:08 --- (In reply to comment #13) See /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note. I sent you my .spec file for a reference. Maybe it is sitting in your spam folder. I am packaging sfxs into %{_libdir} and symlinking them into /usr/local/etc (the binary expects them there). Maybe the %{_libexecdir} would be more appropriate instead of %{_libdir}. Otherwise it is possible to include the full path to the sfx module on the command line. bsd.sfx - default.sfx in the package for FreeBSD (rarbsd-*) dosx.sfx - default.sfx in the package for MS DOS (rarx*) linux-x86.sfx - default.sfx in the package for Linux (rarlinux-*) linux-x86_64.sfx - default.sfx in the package for Linux x64 (rarlinux-x64-*) osx.sfx - default.sfx in the package for Mac OS X (rarosx-*) windows-console.sfx - WinCon.SFX in the WinRAR installer (wrar*) windows.sfx - Default.SFX in the WinRAR installer (wrar*) windows-zip.sfx - Zip.SFX in the WinRAR installer (wrar*) Some packages are compressed by rar. It would be possible to extract them by rar_static in the build time (it would limit the build to work only on %{ix86} and x86_64). Maybe it would be useful to package modules in a standalone package (rar-sfx) to speed up the review of the main rar package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.