[Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #16 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-03-18 11:28:30 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #13)
> @Lubos
> - Why do you think anything got stripped once debuginfo subpackage are disabled?
See /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note.
Indeed, I see this as a bug in
redhat-rpm-config.
I sent you my .spec file for a reference. Maybe it is sitting in your
spam
folder.
Please attach your spec per this review... I haven't received
anything.
> - Where to get the sfx modules ? Where to store them ?
I am packaging sfxs into %{_libdir} and symlinking them into /usr/local/etc
again,
I don't know where to download the sfx files.
Some packages are compressed by rar. It would be possible to extract
them by
rar_static in the build time (it would limit the build to work only on %{ix86}
and x86_64).
It will be better to repackage the sources if such case appears
Maybe it would be useful to package modules in a standalone package
(rar-sfx)
to speed up the review of the main rar package.
Possible as this rar-sfx may be a
noarch package, but only useful on ix86
x86_64. unless I'm wrong.
btw is it relevant to have the linux-x86_64.sfx on x86 ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.