Re: FTBFS for F-19 free section

On Qua, 2013-05-01 at 09:14 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >> ... >> sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64 >> >> >> While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it called sidplayfp, >> which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged libsidplayfp and >> sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed to build with >> libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so the following >> packages can now be retired from rpmfusion: >> >> sidplay >> sidplay-libs >> audacious-plugins-nonfree >> >> I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. What is >> the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion F-19+ repos ? >> >> >> I will manually remove them from the repository. >> taking care of that before the next push. >> >> BTW, what about an audacity update (in both fedora and RPM Fusion ?) >> It looks unmaintained. > > I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but he is back now. > > I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once that is done > I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages. We already have a ticket to fix audacity : https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2707