On 03.11.2007 17:59, KH KH wrote:
2007/11/3, Richi Plana <myfedora(a)richip.dhs.org>:
That's an aim! In my case the "kwizart" repository is
targeted to be
usable with Fedora (and/or) livna/rpmfusion. That's an "experimental"
repository which means that packages are working but still need some
work/testing to be submitted in Fedora or Rpmfusion
/me hopes we can have such a "experimental" repo in rpmfusion soon.
[...]
> It would be nice (to start) if there could be a master database that all
> 3rd-party repos could consult for their packages. To see what might
> conflict with what. Sort of like a distributed 3rd-party repo system.
> The bittorrent / p2p app system for 3rd-party Fedora apps, as it were.
> How about tacking on that proposal to the wiki and if someone with time
> and skill finds it interesting ...
To be sure, only Fedora officials repositories and RPMFusion will be
compatible with the RPMFusion set of packages...
BTW, did we agree on RPM Fusion or RPMFusion? I think it was "RPM Fusion".
Then we can have a distinction with:
[...]
- Repositories that do not uses rpmfusion as a dependencies and should
work with Fedora (probably google and adobe)
[...]
That why I actually edited the wiki already before in parallel to your
post and moved the flash repo into a special section. Andrea moved the
google repo into that section as well.
IOW: hint, it's a wiki ;-)
Cu
knurd