Re: [Bug 3152] Review request: dropbox-repo - 3rd-party repo package for Dropbox client

On 1/29/14, RPM Fusion Bugzilla <noreply(a)rpmfusion.org&gt; wrote: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152 > > --- Comment #38 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; 2014-01-29 08:56:22 > CET --- > (In reply to comment #30) >> > Less legal/policy concerns but will give more work to develop. Not necessarily. See spot's comment in comment #31 link. Basically, if we just points to a repo provided by an ISV like Dropbox it's actually the ISV which is distributing. If we repackage it we becomes more responsible for the contents. > what you mean with "Although we comply with the GL" ? The whole idea witjh the current GL is that we should not make packages from "foreign" repos available, with FESCO/Fedora Legal providing exemptions in some cases. lpf is an exception, but it has beed reviewed and discussed within the FPC. > if I have time in future I'll will try do frp idea, as a sub project of lpf > :) Contributions always welcome! That said, it will probably need a new discussion with FPC since this is an entirely new way of handling this sensitive area. Again: this request is more like a test of the legal/policy ramifications for packaged yum configurations in rpmfusion. Anyone, out there?