Re: State of the RPM Fusion repository for f22
On Sáb, 2015-05-23 at 13:01 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2015-05-22 16:29 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
Hi, Kelvin,
On Ter, 2015-05-19 at 01:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > I've headed a mass rebuid on my own koji instance for
f22-free and it's
> > nearing completion.
>
> Unfortunately, a mass rebuild of the current CVS contents
without separate
> branches for F21 and F22 does not help me at all for
freetype-freeworld. I
> absolutely NEED a separate F21 branch to be able to do any
work on the F22
> version. The package ought to track the version of Freetype
in Fedora. I
> cannot do this with one devel branch for 3 (!) different
releases (F21, F22,
> Rawhide/F23).
>
> Why can we not have CVS branches for F21 and F22?
Your question was already answered. "This is not a high
priority, you
Can you please avoid doing such assumption! Kevin has received an
access to a preview git repository. freetype-freeworld needs to match
the fedora counterpart. Others packagers in the same situation can
request such override. So this is very different than VirtualBox 5.0
which will have to wait.
I really do not appreciate your attempt to hijack the migration
process, please delete this github repository.
If you help with the infra, please at least take one action and stop
re-doing something that was done properly by me already.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023
thx for you understanding.
ok, ok, all repositories deleted, I wrote that is just one idea and is
temporary, I'm not trying hijack nothing, just want have a temporary
solution where I can develop my packages, my organization is a mess
right now .
Anyway is good to hear that migration is moving and thanks for writing
to us and have some news .
Thanks for your hard work and best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.