[Bug 4112] Review request: rfpkg-minimal - Fork of fedpkg-minimal for RPM Fusion
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112
--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser <rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-08 22:44:18 CEST ---
- rfpkg-minimal-0.1.0/bin/rfpkg is licensed under GPLv3+
LICENSE file is GPLv2 ??
That's exciting. This is an issue inherited from fedpkg-minimal that I didn't
notice... take a look at:
* https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/LICENSE
* https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/bin/fedpkg
The fedpkg-minimal spec claims the version is "GPLv2+".
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedpkg-minimal/sources/
I have filed https://fedorahosted.org/fedpkg-minimal/ticket/2 asking for
clarification. In the mean time, should we block on a response to that ticket
or assume GPLv2+ for now?
We might end up with more than free and nonfree namespaces in the
future, so it would be better to be able to "read" which namespace it is.
The logic to try to dl from different namespace is good.
Good to know; I agree that this would be better than hardcoding a list of the
namespaces in the script. I'll see if I can implement some better string
parsing in bash when I get a chance.
It would be fine not to conflict with rfpkg in order to debug
rfpkg-minimal in parallel, I will tune koji to use rfpkg-minimal instead of rfpkg once
introduced.
So you can rename your fork script to rfpkg-minimal directly.
Sounds good, I'll fix that (and deal with the licensing problem) and upload a
new version of the script and package.
Do you have a github account, so you can use
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rfpkg-minimal instead ?
I do; my github username is TC01 (https://github.com/TC01). Should I fork that
repository, push my commit history, and open a pull request?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.