https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3356
--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2014-09-26 14:34:12
CEST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
...
> > Now I would have the reason why downloading plugin "feature" was not
spitted
> > into another package so this one could be kept into fedora ?
>
> It is an integral part of the upstream functionality.
Do you mean that the package will not work with FOSS plugins cross-compiled for
windows if the Adobe Reader and Silverlight plugins download are disabled ?
No, using cross compiled FOSS plugins should work in theory if the plugins are
installed manually.
I still don't understand why downloading would be disabled in the
fedora
package ? SRP is part of gnutls upstream and that doesn't prevent it to be
disable in fedora, that's the same. Or what is the reason ?
Fedora gave a very sound and clear, no discussion possible no answer to
including pipelight in Fedora:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1331
Since it has clearly been rejected for Fedora I don't understand why we're
having this discussion really, if you don't think it is suitable for free, then
lts put it in non-free and be done with it.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.