Re: Any interest in sox with MP3 support?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nicolas Chauvet<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/2/24 Richard Shaw<hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>: >> Ok, I tried the options and they seemed to work except for libmad... >> >> checking mad.h usability... no >> checking mad.h presence... no >> checking for mad.h... no >> checking whether to dlopen mad... yes >> ... >> mp3........................dyn >> id3tag....................yes >> lame......................yes >> dlopen lame...............yes >> mad.......................no >> >> Hmm... where to go from here. > > Please forget about "--enable-dl-lame --enable-dl-mad" I never talk about that. > This is not the the right path for fedora. I understand that we wouldn't use those options for the RPM Fusion package, but wouldn't the Fedora package need these options enabled in order to look for the additional plugin libraries?