On Sex, 2016-07-29 at 15:46 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
@Sergio
I'm not a big fan of private email, later sent to public mailing
list.
But at least , can you ask Florent if he plan to index rpmfusion
packages in this database ?
Database is an : https://pagure.io/symboldb .
Sounds like the the problematic package was removed before we
started
to introduce fc25 build:
koji-rpmfusion list-tagged f25-free --ts=$(date -d "2016-06-13"
"+%s")
"so both versions (glibc-2.23.90-21.fc25 and glibc-2.23.90-22.fc25) are
good for building new binaries in preparation of the full ABI change
reversal"
yes , OK so no need to work here . Hopefully !
Thx
2016-07-28 16:58 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
>
> :P)
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: bugzilla(a)redhat.com
> To: sergio(a)serjux.com
> Subject: [Bug 1344830] glibc: Revert sendmsg/recvmsg ABI changes
> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:44:26 +0000
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344830
>
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> ---
> (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #3)
> >
> >
> > "All affected rawhide packages have been rebuilt."
> >
> > How do we know what are the affected packages ?
> I used this query against symboldb:
>
> SELECT source, MAX(build_time)::date build_time,
> json_agg (DISTINCT arch ORDER BY arch) AS architectures
> FROM (SELECT SUBSTRING (p.source FROM '(.*)\.src\.rpm$') AS
> source,
> build_time, p.arch
> FROM symboldb.package p
> JOIN symboldb.file USING (package_id)
> JOIN symboldb.elf_reference er USING (contents_id)
> JOIN symboldb.package_set_member USING (package_id)
> WHERE er.name IN ('recvmsg', 'recvmmsg',
'sendmsg',
> 'sendmmsg')
> AND er.version = 'GLIBC_2.24') x
> GROUP BY source ORDER BY 1;
>
> I applied this against the Koji build roots for i386, x86_64,
> armhfp,
> ppc64,
> ppc64le, s390x, aarch64.
>
> --
>
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
--
Sérgio M. B.