Re: mpeg2dec re-created as libmpeg2
2008/7/24 David Juran <david(a)juran.se>:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 24.07.2008 10:31, David Juran wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> >
> >> - Update package
> >> - import new package wich obsoletes Upgrade/Path
> > OK, let's get back to the root of this problem. Maybe the timing for
> > re-creating the mpeg2dec package under a different name was
> > suboptimal...
> > Nicolas, how about you back out your libmpeg2 package from rpmfusion and
> > then we just import the livna package there. Then when things settle
> > down and rpmfusion is firmly in place I can cede ownership of the
> > package to you to do whatever you like with it...
>
> Could work. But is there a reasons why we can't simply go the other way
> around and import the RPM Fusion libmpeg2 to livna devel now?
I'm fine with that (-:
Nicolas, do you agree it's a good idea/could you do this?
How this will make
things different than just picking it from rpmfusion ?
This problem is really an easy level one.
Package EVR must be higher in F-9 than in F-8.
But the same is true to rpmfusion from livna/freshrpms. (within the
same release)
What would any want to talk more about this problem ?
Will that end finally ? and please remove the mpeg2dec-0.5.1.lvn10 !
Any other work for libmpeg2 have to be done in the RPMFusion version since now.
Nicolas (kwizart)
/David