http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #97 from rc040203(a)freenet.de 2010-02-12 06:58:22 ---
(In reply to comment #95)
(In reply to comment #94)
> I haven't checked how difficult implementing this would be. It would likely be
> a massive work of several of xbmc's internals.
Upstream alludes to how this might be done here:
http://trac.xbmc.org/ticket/8590#comment:8 Well, ... I think, xmbc configuation is
foobar'd and could use a re-write from
scratch :)
However, provided the answers I read in this xbmc ticket, I'd assume this to be
close to impossible to implement.
Any chance you could pickup the formal review,
I will try to so
ASAP, but I am currently having real problems in finding a
free
time slot.
or should I perhaps canvas some
others on Fedora and/or rpmfusion devel list?
Feel free to do so ...
(In reply to comment #96)
It may be more productive to hold off on a review until the next
version
Any ETA?
I am hesitant to wait for Camelot+1, because I'd expect Camelot+1 to introduce
further configuration issues, similar to those we already addressed, i.e. I'd
expect us having to start a review from the beginning, while I believe to be
close to let the current package into rpmfusion.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.