Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 04.10.2014 o 11:39, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: >> 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto >> <sergio(a)serjux.com >> <mailto:sergio@serjux.com>>: >> >> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> > 2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski >> <belegdol(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>: >> > W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: >> > > On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> > >> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: >> > >>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> > >>>> Dear all, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have >> > another rebuild >> > >>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have >> > failed, which is >> > >>>> not bad given the extent of API changes: >> > >>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: >> > 'struct a52_ctx' has >> > >>>> no member named 'frame' >> > >>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was >> > not declared >> > >>>> in this scope >> > >>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error: >> > 'av_find_stream_info' was >> > >>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt >> > first) >> > >>>> - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and >> > later are not >> > >>>> supported yet. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be >> > the good time to >> > >>>> do the rebuild? >> > >>> >> > >>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of >> > others >> > >>> packages, no problem. >> > >>> >> > >>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like >> > put it at >> > >>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the >> > packages, with >> > >>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on >> > update-testing for more >> > >>> time than usual, but is not my decision . >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Best regards, >> > >>> >> > >> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of >> > rebuilding mplayer. >> > >> > >> > >> > Can we care about rebuilding all dependencies at the same time ? >> > >> yes of course , I will take care , >> >> but may I build all for new ffmpeg /x624 for F20 ? >> >> >> SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was done >> in Rawhide. >> I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have >> coordinated the update. >> PERIOD. >> >> >> -- >> - >> >> Nicolas (kwizart) > > In case this gets reconsidered at some point in the future: I have done > a test rebuild of F-20 dependecies against ffmpeg-2.3.4, and all 37 have > built correctly. > Moreover, only libavfilter has a soname bump (please find rpmsodiff > output attached). This means that we really only need to rebuild > dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc. > > Best regards, > Julian > Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained branches list: https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html Thus, if we ever rebase F-20, we should use 2.2 and not 2.3. Best regards, Julian