On Saturday 13 December 2008 04:45:58 am Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
2008/12/13, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>:
> > > The question is - who decided it. I wish to know whether rpmfusion is
> > > a community-driven project or not.
> >
> > Please read these:
> >
http://rpmfusion.org/SteeringCommittee
>
>
http://lists.fedoraunity.org/pipermail/repo-merge-discussion/2007-April/0
>00096.html
Understood - rpmfusion is not a community-project (important decisions
were made w/o asking community directly).
So, finally, what benefits rpmfusion provides over Livna? I see only
disadvantages (cannot include software, which someone claims illegal
in some particular country).
Well, rpmfusion will continue to do updates and new packages, while livna no
longer does (I don't think even new installs can get any package from livna).
That's an advantage for RPM fusion.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org>