http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #121 from Alex Lancaster <alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2010-03-03
11:28:23 ---
(In reply to comment #120)
(In reply to comment #119)
> OK, I have some feedback on cximage (as well as some other libraries), from
> upstream:
>
> "1) XBMC wraps cximage in a dll interface.
This is the actual cause behind much of xbmc's bloat: Instead of using a
system's dynamic loader, they implemented an application-specific dll-loader ;)
No doubt, but the question is, what should we do about it for the moment in
terms of packaging? I can't see packaging it separately and getting xbmc to
compile against it in the short-term.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.