http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802
Jochen Schmitt <Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt <Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de> 2009-10-13 21:28:47
---
Good:
+ Package name fullfill naming guidelines.
+ Package contains recent stable release of the application
+ URL on the URL tag shows on proper project homepage
+ Package contains several subpackages
+ License tag contains IBM as a valid OSS license. So we can
put this package into the free branch of rpmfusion.
+ Copyright note on the top of the source files matches with
license tag
+ Could download upstream package via spectool -g
+ Package tar ball matches with upstream one
(md5sum: 375721949e33a91aa62e006f2ba7b3e)
+ Local build works without failure
+ Rpmlint is quite on source rpm
+ Debuginfo package contains sources
+ Build on mock works fine
+ All package are owned by the package
+ Not file belog to another package.
Bad:
- Don't make a build with bundled libraries. Please remove
the bundled libraries and make a build agains the
existing system libaries
- Please use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc
- Build didn't hournour the $RPM_OPT_FLGS during the build
- make haven't %{?_smp_mflags}. If the build is not SMP compilant
please at a comment and open a upstream bug report
- It's not recommented to use the %makeinstall macro.
- Package don't contains verbatin copy of the license text.
Please contact upstream to include one. (No Blocker)
- Please fix the knewn rpmlint issues.
- Please add a ChangeLog entry for each new release
- Package should not contains static libraries
- Coult not test install, because openafs kmod is not available.
- We prefer to use %defattr(-,root,root,-)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.