On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/12/18 Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/12/18 Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name>:
>>> Why do you want to use a different naming scheme than all the other mock
>>> config files, which use this scheme:
>>>
>>> <name>-<release>-<arch>.cfg
>> because the namespace is already taken.
>
> Assuming <name> would be "rpmfusion_free" who took it?
What would be the namespace of the epel cfg files for rpmfusion then ?
Very right. what about:
rpmfusion_free
rpmfusion_free_epel
?
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna