Re: mpeg2dec re-created as libmpeg2

2008/7/24 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt;: > On 24.07.2008 11:18, KH KH wrote: >> 2008/7/24 David Juran <david(a)juran.se&gt;: >>> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:52 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> On 24.07.2008 10:31, David Juran wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 10:13 +0200, KH KH wrote: >>>>>> - Update package >>>>>> - import new package wich obsoletes Upgrade/Path >>>>> OK, let's get back to the root of this problem. Maybe the timing for >>>>> re-creating the mpeg2dec package under a different name was >>>>> suboptimal... >>>>> Nicolas, how about you back out your libmpeg2 package from rpmfusion >>>>> and >>>>> then we just import the livna package there. Then when things settle >>>>> down and rpmfusion is firmly in place I can cede ownership of the >>>>> package to you to do whatever you like with it... >>>> Could work. But is there a reasons why we can't simply go the other way >>>> around and import the RPM Fusion libmpeg2 to livna devel now? >>> I'm fine with that (-: >>> Nicolas, do you agree it's a good idea/could you do this? >> How this will make things different than just picking it from rpmfusion ? > For the user there is no RPM Fusion yet. > >> This problem is really an easy level one. > Yes -- just ship the same package (the one you imported to RPM Fusion= in > RPM Fusion and Livna. The EVR for the package in RPM Fusions of course must > he higher then the one in Livna and Freshrpms. Problem solved, user can test > and report problems now; if they find some we can fix them before RPM Fusion > gets live. > Please!!! Enought talking! REMOVE this package now. How it is possible that you don't understand this is not the right way.