[Bug 2133] Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API

(In reply to comment #4) > Few quick things I noticed while skimming through your SPEC: > > *It seems a little redundant to do prep on both sources, if only one is > required, it seems unnecessary. I'm not sure how one should handle this but it > did strike me as odd when I saw it. Yeah, good catch. I've fixed it to prep only the necessary source. > *You have not included documentation in your package. At a quick glance of the > source, I have noticed there is license files and a readme in the tar's. All of > these are documentation and should be included, no? Yes, again you're right. I assumed that, because it's a proprietary closed-source package, it wouldn't include any documentation. I've fixed the package to include the documentation. ... ...I've fixed the "no-documentation" bug. Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify-10.1.16-2.fc16.src.rpm