Re: Updating F-20 to ffmpeg-2.2.10 (was: ffmpeg-2.4 released)

W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze: >> Hi, >> >> On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>> >>> Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained >>> branches list: >>> >>> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html >>> >>> Thus, if we ever rebase F-20, we should use 2.2 and not 2.3. >> >> The mode I like to work and to coordinate the mass rebuild for a stable >> branch (F-20), is first be test in devel . We have packages in devel, we >> test it for some time and when we can say that are stable , so we could >> *copy* to F-20 , another point was: mass rebuild was for ffmpeg/x264 , >> not only ffmpeg . >> So it is important have .specs for packages that compile in all Fedora >> releases. Having 2 trees, one for F20, other for devel , is just >> justified when is a very core package like udev or systemd ... , but >> for rpmfusion the point is other, maintainers are not aware ... >> So *theoretically* my solution was build ffmpeg 2.2 in devel, test it >> and copy to F-20 , but devel already have 2.3 so is not practical . >> >> Moving forward, just update "ffmpeg" on F20 seems to me acceptable , >> like you wrote "only libavfilter has a soname bump (snip) This means >> that we really only need to rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc." but we >> miss the test phase, we need guarantee that ffmpeg version was tested , >> any suggestion ? > > ffmpeg-2.2 was in devel between March and August. Moreover, the reason > why upstream picked it over 2.3 was that it is used by more downstream > distros: OpenSUSE, SUSE Enterprise and ROSA [1]. If we let it sit in > -testing for a bit longer than usual, I believe this will be enough. > >> >> Saying that and giving up mass rebuild ffmpeg/x264 for F-20, no need >> preserve devel as is and we can do the mass rebuild for ffmpeg 2.4 on >> devel , anything pending ? > > I don't think anything has changed since last time: dvbcut and > kmediafactory fail to rebuild, vlc needs a patch, everything else builds > fine. David Timms was working on making dvbcut work, but I have not > heard from him regarding whether he was successful. > >> >> BTW what packages (.spec) do you have ? that are different from stable >> branches to devel ? > > Only ffmpeg and mplayer. ffmpeg due to its numerous dependencies, and > mplayer because it is highly dependent on ffmpeg. > >> >> Thanks and best regards, >> > > Thank you. > > [1] https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams > Where do we stand on this?