On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande
>>> <anto.trande(a)gmail.com <mailto:anto.trande@gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on
>>> Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild
>>> (
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as soon
>>> as possible:
>>>
>>> faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame
>>>
>>>
>>> All of them are actually available, please double check your
>>> system.
>>>
>>> Nicolas (kwizart)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> are available as fc23 packages?
>
> no , they are available as fc22 in F23
>
Honestly, I don't understand how we can tolerate something like that,
that is using on Fedora 23 some packages built on Fedora 22; is there
not any dependency issue?
No. RPM doesn't care about disttag for dependencies unless you actually
specify a dependency using it, e.g.:
Requires: foo = 1.1-2.fc23
As long as SONAMEs match (or actually, as long as Provides: match), the
dependencies are satisfied. There's nothing wrong with having .fc22
packages in F23+ repos.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion
http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"