[Bug 2269] Review request: ffmpeg-compat - ffmpeg compat libraries
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2269
Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
|mfusion.org |
--- Comment #6 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-20 21:36:30 CEST ---
Ok, about done with my full review. Just so you know since you're using the
_isa macro with a "?", testing for it's existence is redundant.
+: OK
-: must be fixed
=: should be fixed (at your discretion)
?: Question or clairification needed
N: not applicable
MUST:
[+] rpmlint output: shown in comment.
[+] follows package naming guidelines
[+] spec file base name matches package name
[+] package meets the packaging guidelines
[+] package uses a Fedora approved license: GPLv2+
[+] license field matches the actual license.
[+] license file is included in %doc: COPYING
[+] spec file is in American English
[+] spec file is legible
[+] sources match upstream: md5sum matches (f8a49dea28bd33d3e5b12d1694ae8227)
[+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested EL6
[N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch
[+] all build requirements in BuildRequires
[N] spec file handles locales properly
[+] ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] no bundled copies of system libraries
[+] no relocatable packages
[+] package owns all directories that it creates
[+] no files listed twice in %files
[+] proper permissions on files
[+] consistent use of macros
[+] code or permissible content
[N] large documentation in -doc
[+] no runtime dependencies in %doc
[+] header files in -devel
[N] static libraries in -static
[N] .so in -devel
[N] -devel requires main package
[+] package contains no libtool archives
[N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate
[+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
[+] all filenames in UTF-8
SHOULD:
[+] query upstream for license text
[N] description and summary contains available translations
[+] package builds in mock
[+] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64
[?] package functions as described: Not tested
[+] sane scriptlets
[+] subpackages require the main package
[+] placement of pkgconfig files
[+] file dependencies versus package dependencies
[N] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.