On 08/25/2016 02:30 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2016-08-25 22:19 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
>> On 08/25/2016 06:28 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 25 August 2016 at 10:24, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> On 08/25/2016 10:01 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> Specially as ffmpeg doesn't do symbol version, if one process
has
>>>>> dependencies using both version, it will crash.
>>>> AFAIU, as long as these packages are properly linked (and not libraries
>>>> not being dlopened), package deps on SONAMEs would conflict and thus
>>>> prevent such problems.
>>>
>>> The point is that not all SONAMEs change with each FFmpeg version bump,
>>> so, for example, ffmpeg-3.0.x and ffmpeg-3.1.x may have mostly the same
>>> SONAMEs.
>>
>> Here is an attempt at ffmpeg2.8 and ffmpeg3.0. This relies on different
> I've strictly no question about how not to make conflict between
> theses, so I'm not even looking at your spec since I don't think they
> will bring any value to the "discution".
> Please have a look at ffmpeg-compat for not conflicting with -devel
> Also please have a look this for not conflicting with ffmpeg version
> of the same ABI:
>
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/16/SRPMS/ffmpeg4vlc-0.6-0.4.20100612svn.fc...
> Here are the ABI from ffmpeg upstream:
http://ffmpeg.org/download.html#releases
Well, I'll give you the courtesy of looking at your specs, even if you won't
do the same for me.
You are still in the "How not to make conflicts"
question whereas this
question is out of interest over "which version to choose for a
general usage."
You are still in the false premise that you can have any versions as
soon as they do not conflict for general usage and let packagers
choose theirs.
You have also ignored several of my earlier comments, so I wouldn't
say courtesy is on your side here.
This discussion has gone wrong, so I'm dropping here.