http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985
David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|2 |3
--- Comment #31 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2010-08-24 16:58:23 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec
ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX-0.90.4.00-7.20100806cvs.fc14.src.rpm
OK, I had a try to test build, install and run on F13 x86_64.
This was successfull, using:
alternatives --config java
There are 2 programs which provide 'java'.
Selection Command
-----------------------------------------------
1 /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.5.0-gcj/bin/java
*+ 2 /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java
No immediate issue with runtime operation of the program.
A fresh snapshot was compared with the srpm's included cvs snapshot. After
extraction, a diff -ur between the two folder structures are identical.
I believe we have covered all the packaging guidelines and the specific java
ones as well. Since there hasn't been any further expression of improvments to
make, I am hearby APPROVING the above package.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.