Re: Broadcom hybrid_wl driver

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Please don't use the term "-kmod-common" in the package name; just > call it "broadcom-hybrid-wl" and add > > Provides: broadcom-hybrid-wl-kmod-common = %{version}-%{release} > > Thinking about it some more: Maybe the best scheme for both packages > might be: > > "kmod-wl" for the kmod package > "broadcom-hybrid-wl" for the second "userland" package (which then > needs to provide wl-kmod-common = %{version}-%{release}) > > Opinions? As an end user I find that slightly confusing to have so many different permutations. I would find it less confusing to do your original way and drop the "hybrid" altogether: "kmod-wl" for the kmod package "broadcom-wl" for the "userland" package

which provides broadcom-wl-common = %{version}-%{release}

[...]