http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #90 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-21 23:14:54 ---
(In reply to comment #89)
(In reply to comment #88)
>
> Zarko, it is a good practice to add a comment for each patch and additional
> source file (if there's any), indicating what it is for and giving a link
> to the upstream bugtracker and/or to the respective commit from the trunk.
> Could you add these comments?
Yes I can, but I explained these patches in Changelog section of spec file:
I meant, commenting about the patches/additional sources where you actually
declare them
See for instance:
http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/traverso/devel/traverso.spec?root=fr...
? What with PPC??
Can we build this package on PPC architecture or not, after last spec
intervention?
Or I must put
ExcludeArch: PPC, PPC64
No, please don't exclude them. Let us see how things go when you do the builds.
? What with segfaults under F10?
Will we build only for F11, or...
I would request cvs for all of them but do not build on dists < F-11 until the
segfault issue is resolved.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.