http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478
--- Comment #6 from solarflow99(a)gmail.com 2009-04-04 22:59:00 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
> ok, i'd prefer to ask them if I can just ship the binary image alone, is a copy
> of an email ok for this?
Yes, that should be fine.
ok, here is the OK,
I certainly have no problem with you including FreeDOS.
Note that much of the FreeDOS programs are distributed under the GNU
GPL or a similarly free license. You should find a way to make FreeDOS
source code available to the end-user of this RPM. Maybe a version of
FreeDOS based on fdbasecd.iso (binary-only) and another version based
on fdfullcd.iso (includes source.) That way, the end-user would have
the option to get a version of FreeDOS that includes the source code.
Or, I see there is discussion in your bugzilla about including the
FreeDOS source in the SRPM, which also makes sense to me.
I would be ok with either option, I think - so long as source somehow
is made available to users, under the GNU GPL.
Thanks,
-jh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.